Skip to main content

Great Masters: Prokudin-Gorskii's color images

Usually pioneers come first, then masters come later. Russian photographer Sergei Prokudin-Gorskii was both a pioneer and a master of early color photography. By "early", I mean over 100 years ago. Some of the basic concepts involved in color photography were sorted out in the late 19th century and there were other photographers taking color photos; but it doesn't become easy until the release of Kodak Kodacolor film in 1941. So Prokudin-Gorskii was way ahead of the curve.

At that time, serious photography of any kind involved work, typically involving large cameras on large wooden tripods exposing on glass plates. Prokudin-Gorskii's method involved taking three exposures in a row, using blue, green and red filters. He was then able to combine the plates to generate a color image that could be projected as a slide. The images have now been digitally recombined. Even with the help of computers it's an arduous process. You can read about it on the Library of Congress's website, here.

And the colors he has left us are amazing! Here's the church of St John Chrysostom in Jaroslavl:

Prokudin-Gorskii (1911): Church of St John Chrysostom (Jaroslavl). In collection of Library of Congress.

With good light, a photo like the one above might be completed in a second or two. This interior photo on the other hand might have taken a minute or longer. He didn't have the option of simply cranking the camera up to ISO 3200 (or any ISO, for that matter)!


Prokudin-Gorskii (1911): Iconostasis of church in Borodino. 


This image of a Khazakhstani Emir might have taken a full second or more to expose.

Prokudin-Gorskii (taken 1905-1915?): Alim Khan, Emir of Bukhara

Here are the "negatives" for the photo of Emir — or rather, of the three photos of the Emir:


Whenever I find myself lying awake late and night and wondering why photography is so difficult, I try to remember what the great photographers of the past went through. Prokudin-Gorskii might have given both legs and his left hand to be able to shoot with an iPhone 5, let alone an Olympus E-M1.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wireless control of Olympus OM-D E-M1 with OI.Share app

The Olympus Image Share or "OI.Share" app for smartphones allows you to do some very neat things with the Olympus OM-D E-M1 camera, like control focus, shutter and other settings, download photos to your phone, and geo-tag your photos. The only problem with this partnership between camera and phone — at least for me as a micro-four-thirds and Olympus novice — was getting it to work.

The documentation provided in the app and in the user manual for the camera is typically bad. I wrote this blog article from the notes I started making as I was trying to sort this out for myself. I hope I save somebody else an hour and some worry.

Ingredients To get started you'll need to have an EM-1 and a smart phone with the OI.Share app installed. I'm using an iPhone 5 running iOS 7 and version 2.1.1 of the OI.Share app. I downloaded the app from the App Store.

Addendum 7 January 2015: This article was first published a little over a year ago, in December 2013. I just went through the…

Why I switched from Lightroom to Aperture

Read today an excellent article, "Why I use Aperture instead of Lightroom," by Mel Ashar; it's posted at the Aperture Expert blog edited by Joseph Linaschke. Ashar, a landscape and architectural photographer, provides a useful catalog of some of the reasons Aperture is a strong choice for photographers who use Macs. He focuses on the file-management advantages of Aperture that arise from the fact that Apple controls an entire file ecosystem, comprised not just of Aperture, but of iCloud and the file systems on both Macs and iOS devices (iPhone, iPad).

Now, notwithstanding the advantages Ashar enumerates, the consensus seems to be that, Aperture as a photo processing app lags way behind Lightroom. I disagree with the consensus. In fact, shortly after the public beta of Lightroom 5 became available, I started looking again at Aperture and this time I really gave it the old college try. To my surprise, I discovered that I liked it. I liked it a lot. So, instead of upgrading…

Why DxO Optics Pro 10 stays in my toolbox

You can read this post here, or read my reposted version over over at Medium.


I've used over a dozen apps in the last decade to convert my raw files and process my digital images. Today I rely on four main tools to process my images: Lightroom 5.7, the Nik suite of apps (now owned and published by Google), onOne Software's Perfect Photo Suite 9 — and DxO Optics Pro 10. I want to talk about Perfect Photo Suite some other time; it's my replacement for Photoshop and I really like it. But today, I want to say nice things about Optics Pro 10.

Might seem an odd thing to admit, but I don't really want to use Optics Pro. It can't hold a candle to Lightroom for browsing and managing images. And it doesn't support layers (like Perfect Photo Suite) or much in the way of selective editing (like Lightroom, Nik and Perfect Photo Suite do). I'm able to get what I want from most of my images using Lightroom, or Nik or Perfect Photo. So most of the time, I don't need Op…