Skip to main content

Test sharing photo album from Google+

I'm surprised — dumbfounded might be a better word — that Google won't let me embed thumbnails in a Blogger blog, the way Flickr does, the way Wordpress and Tumblr do.

This seems to be the best Google can do right now: a horribly ugly link to a Google+ gallery of photos. No thumbs that I want, and all that extra Google+ packaging garbage that I don't want. Compare this post to my previous one embedding a Flickr gallery.

In addition to mentioning how ugly this looks in published form and how useless it is, I have to add that it looks even worse in the Blogger editor because the link isn't visible at all. It's just an html link and doesn't render in the editor while I'm composing my post. Which means it's hard for me, while I'm writing, to keep track of where the embedded object is.

I draw two lessons from this.

First, Blogger simply isn't an up-to-date blogging platform. Pains me more than you know to say this, but this realization has been growing on me for a while. I don't know why, but Google doesn't seem even a little interested in Blogger. I might be able to sort this out on the Blogger end by simply embedding Flickr galleries instead of Google+ galleries. But the possibility of returning to Wordpress is growing. I've noticed that my old Wordpress posts get more comments than my Blogger posts. Why? Presumably because Wordpress has a great system for touting fresh content to its readership. With Google, each new post seems to drop into the ocean of Google+ "content" and get lost immediately.

The other lesson is, Google+ just isn't as good a place to share photos as I had hoped. When it was new, there was a lot of talk about how superior it was to Facebook. Well, yeah. Facebook may be the biggest photo-sharing service in the world (in terms of the number of photos stored on its servers) but it has always stunk in this department. So being better than Facebook isn't much of a boast. Flickr and 500px (to name just two) do it right.

All in all, total fail for Google. And yes, I'm disappointed.


Popular posts from this blog

Wireless control of Olympus OM-D E-M1 with OI.Share app

The Olympus Image Share or "OI.Share" app for smartphones allows you to do some very neat things with the Olympus OM-D E-M1 camera, like control focus, shutter and other settings, download photos to your phone, and geo-tag your photos. The only problem with this partnership between camera and phone — at least for me as a micro-four-thirds and Olympus novice — was getting it to work.

The documentation provided in the app and in the user manual for the camera is typically bad. I wrote this blog article from the notes I started making as I was trying to sort this out for myself. I hope I save somebody else an hour and some worry.

Ingredients To get started you'll need to have an EM-1 and a smart phone with the OI.Share app installed. I'm using an iPhone 5 running iOS 7 and version 2.1.1 of the OI.Share app. I downloaded the app from the App Store.

Addendum 7 January 2015: This article was first published a little over a year ago, in December 2013. I just went through the…

Why DxO Optics Pro 10 stays in my toolbox

You can read this post here, or read my reposted version over over at Medium.

I've used over a dozen apps in the last decade to convert my raw files and process my digital images. Today I rely on four main tools to process my images: Lightroom 5.7, the Nik suite of apps (now owned and published by Google), onOne Software's Perfect Photo Suite 9 — and DxO Optics Pro 10. I want to talk about Perfect Photo Suite some other time; it's my replacement for Photoshop and I really like it. But today, I want to say nice things about Optics Pro 10.

Might seem an odd thing to admit, but I don't really want to use Optics Pro. It can't hold a candle to Lightroom for browsing and managing images. And it doesn't support layers (like Perfect Photo Suite) or much in the way of selective editing (like Lightroom, Nik and Perfect Photo Suite do). I'm able to get what I want from most of my images using Lightroom, or Nik or Perfect Photo. So most of the time, I don't need Op…

Why I switched from Lightroom to Aperture

Read today an excellent article, "Why I use Aperture instead of Lightroom," by Mel Ashar; it's posted at the Aperture Expert blog edited by Joseph Linaschke. Ashar, a landscape and architectural photographer, provides a useful catalog of some of the reasons Aperture is a strong choice for photographers who use Macs. He focuses on the file-management advantages of Aperture that arise from the fact that Apple controls an entire file ecosystem, comprised not just of Aperture, but of iCloud and the file systems on both Macs and iOS devices (iPhone, iPad).

Now, notwithstanding the advantages Ashar enumerates, the consensus seems to be that, Aperture as a photo processing app lags way behind Lightroom. I disagree with the consensus. In fact, shortly after the public beta of Lightroom 5 became available, I started looking again at Aperture and this time I really gave it the old college try. To my surprise, I discovered that I liked it. I liked it a lot. So, instead of upgrading…