Skip to main content

A99 v1.02 firmware update reduces flash delay

Three days ago, Sony released firmware v1.02 update for the A99. The update officially adds support for the SAL50F14Z lens, and improves some aspect of video that I don't personally care about. What I do care about, a lot, is that the update also reduces a problem with the A99's built-in, optically-triggered wireless flash.

Built-in, optically-triggered wireless flash works by triggering remote, off-camera flashes with an pre-flash from the flash on the camera itself. Another way to do the same thing is to use radio triggers. But radio triggers are expensive and you have to go to the trouble of attaching them to your flash units. The optical system is attractive because it's basically free — it's built into the camera and the flash units — and it generally works pretty well.

Except that it didn't work so well on the Sony A99 when it was first released late last year. You'd press the shutter, the flash on your camera would fire the triggering burst, and a beat later, the off-camera flashes would fire while the shutter was opening. The delay was small but distinctly noticeable. You can see it demonstrated by Gary Friedman in a video review he made of the A99. Fast forward to 2:15, which is where he's demonstrating the delay in the original A99.

Well, the v1.02 update doesn't eliminate the problem, but it does reduce it. Here's a quick video showing the delay now. I have followed Friedman's approach by showing how the A850 works first, then switching to the A99. The A850's response sounds like a single plikx. The A99's sounds like a quick two-syllable ker-plikx. If you want to jump over the A850 examples to the first examples from the A99, go to 1:05.



I forgot to take some video showing the delay on my camera before I installed the 1.02 firmware update, so I've compared my firmware v1.02 video to Friedman's firmware v1.0 video. I would estimate that the flash delay now is about half what it used to be. Used to be bad, now it's less bad. 

Anyway, it works better now than it did last week. And I want to end by mentioning that, when I'm not triggering slave flashes this way, I love the A99. It is without a doubt the best camera I've ever worked with. And if I did more off-camera flash work than I do, I'd just give in and go back to radio triggers, which would completely finesse the problem. I think the very positive mini-review that Friedman includes in his video was and remains right on the money. It's a great camera. I just wish that, in this one respect, it worked as well as the A850.

Comments

  1. The f60m flash will work off camera with the a99 using the My Slave 100 radio trigger and receiver. It works without adaptors or modifications.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wireless control of Olympus OM-D E-M1 with OI.Share app

The Olympus Image Share or "OI.Share" app for smartphones allows you to do some very neat things with the Olympus OM-D E-M1 camera, like control focus, shutter and other settings, download photos to your phone, and geo-tag your photos. The only problem with this partnership between camera and phone — at least for me as a micro-four-thirds and Olympus novice — was getting it to work.

The documentation provided in the app and in the user manual for the camera is typically bad. I wrote this blog article from the notes I started making as I was trying to sort this out for myself. I hope I save somebody else an hour and some worry.

Ingredients To get started you'll need to have an EM-1 and a smart phone with the OI.Share app installed. I'm using an iPhone 5 running iOS 7 and version 2.1.1 of the OI.Share app. I downloaded the app from the App Store.

Addendum 7 January 2015: This article was first published a little over a year ago, in December 2013. I just went through the…

Why DxO Optics Pro 10 stays in my toolbox

You can read this post here, or read my reposted version over over at Medium.


I've used over a dozen apps in the last decade to convert my raw files and process my digital images. Today I rely on four main tools to process my images: Lightroom 5.7, the Nik suite of apps (now owned and published by Google), onOne Software's Perfect Photo Suite 9 — and DxO Optics Pro 10. I want to talk about Perfect Photo Suite some other time; it's my replacement for Photoshop and I really like it. But today, I want to say nice things about Optics Pro 10.

Might seem an odd thing to admit, but I don't really want to use Optics Pro. It can't hold a candle to Lightroom for browsing and managing images. And it doesn't support layers (like Perfect Photo Suite) or much in the way of selective editing (like Lightroom, Nik and Perfect Photo Suite do). I'm able to get what I want from most of my images using Lightroom, or Nik or Perfect Photo. So most of the time, I don't need Op…

Why I switched from Lightroom to Aperture

Read today an excellent article, "Why I use Aperture instead of Lightroom," by Mel Ashar; it's posted at the Aperture Expert blog edited by Joseph Linaschke. Ashar, a landscape and architectural photographer, provides a useful catalog of some of the reasons Aperture is a strong choice for photographers who use Macs. He focuses on the file-management advantages of Aperture that arise from the fact that Apple controls an entire file ecosystem, comprised not just of Aperture, but of iCloud and the file systems on both Macs and iOS devices (iPhone, iPad).

Now, notwithstanding the advantages Ashar enumerates, the consensus seems to be that, Aperture as a photo processing app lags way behind Lightroom. I disagree with the consensus. In fact, shortly after the public beta of Lightroom 5 became available, I started looking again at Aperture and this time I really gave it the old college try. To my surprise, I discovered that I liked it. I liked it a lot. So, instead of upgrading…