Skip to main content

SONY A77: expanding dynamic range with DRO or HDR (or not)

I work near my kitchen (for obvious reasons). As I look to my right from where I am sitting, I see dark shadows down around the cabinets under the counter, and I also see through the big windows to the bright outdoors full of trees, cars, other houses. This is a scene with a high dynamic range. The miraculous thing is, my eyes can see detail in the shadows and in the bright areas equally well and at the same time. Pretty amazing, really.

No camera can match that. Photographing this scene the "old-fashioned way" (say, in M mode), I would have to expose for the shadows (which will result in the windows appearing to be bright white areas with little detail beyond them) or expose for what I can see outdoors (which will mean the shadows inside will become black areas, again, with little detail). It's a dilemma. What good photographers have done for ages is learn how to make the best compromise, so that we get some detail in the highlights and some detail in the shadows, or so that we expose for the part of the scene that matters most to us and simply live with the fact that details at the other end of the light-dark scale are sacrificed.

Note that the problem I'm talking about exists only when there's a large contrast between bright and the dark areas of the scene you are photographing. This isn't always the case, in fact, it isn't often the case. Take a photo in the shade of a tree on an afternoon when the sun is hidden behind light clouds, and you'll probably be dealing with a very modest dynamic range, one that is well within the reach of your camera's sensor. And when dynamic range is a problem, one way to fix it is by balancing the light. You might for example put a flash on the camera, to throw some light into the face of your subject when you're shooting outdoors. These are solutions that don't rely on your camera at all.


Here's what my camera sees. This is what the raw file looked like when I opened it in Lightroom 3.5, with no processing other than Lightroom's very minimal default:

Raw file, unprocessed.
And, just to emphasize where the problems lie, here's is what I saw on screen when I turned on Lightroom's "show clipping" feature:

Raw file in Lightroom with "show clipping" turned on.

The red is where the scene is brighter than the camera could capture (with these settings) and the blue is where the scene is too dark for the camera (with these settings) to retain detail.

Building a better mousetrap, er, light-trap


Now, camera makers want to make life easier for us all and they have, for a long time, been trying to solve this problem in the camera, in two different and somewhat contradictory ways.  First, makers of sensors like Sony have been working to expand the dynamic range of the sensors. Second, camera makers have been working to squeeze as much dynamic range into their captures as possible. Either way, the goal is to get a more accurate picture of the world, a picture that is — or at least seems to be — closer to what our eyes really see.

Sony is undoubtedly the leader in this area — both in its sensor development and in the work it has done with in-camera processing — and the current state of the art is available on Sony's new DSLT cameras, the A65 and the A77. I'm not going to talk about improving the sensor because the capabilities of any given camera's sensor are a given and you can't get a better sensor without buying a new camera. I am going to talk a little about improvements in how these cameras process images for you.

DRO


One way to improve the overall exposure is for the camera to do some quick adjustment of the lighting at the moment of capture. To do this on the Sony A65 or A77, you use the DRO (dynamic range optimization) feature. DRO tries to squeeze more contrast into a single file. Here's a picture of my kitchen with DRO set to "Auto".

DRO AUTO
Not as bad as that first picture I took without DRO enabled. In that picture, the windows were just white panels, and the cabinets were much darker.

Sensing that there was at least a five to six stop gap between the darks and the lights here, I then changed the DRO setting from Auto to "Lv5":

DRO Lv5

Not a big improvement. The shadows have been lightened a good bit — but the bright areas outside have, too. This isn't worse than the DRO AUTO shot but it's not better either.


In-camera HDR


In-camera HDR ("high dynamic range") is a different way to solve the problem. Like on-the-computer HDR, in-camera HDR starts with several different exposures of the same scene, then combines them into a single output file in which the well-exposed bright areas from one shot have been combined with the best-exposed dark areas from another, and the composite file has been adjusted to make things look natural. Sony's programmers have written programs that seem to do a very good job — sometimes — of combining the exposures. But a key factor in getting good results, is providing the processor with good source images. The new fixed-mirror (SLT) cameras from Sony are especially well suited to gathering the multiple exposures because, lacking a moving mirror, these cameras can take more shots per second than their traditional reflex (moving) mirror competitors. All of the pictures here were taken hand-held. Computer-based HDR is usually done with a tripod.

When you shoot with the HDR feature enabled, be prepared for the camera to respond differently. Instead of the single shutter noise, you'll hear several shutter noises in rapid succession. And then it takes several seconds for the camera's processor to create the resulting HDR file.

Here's a shot with HDR set to "Auto".

HDR AUTO
Sort of the opposite of DRO AUTO: The HDR AUTO has preserved detail outside well but surrendered detail in the shadows.

Once again, knowing that the dynamic range of this scene was fairly extreme, I set HDR to its max (6 EV). Here's the result:

HDR 6EV

And that, ladies and gentlemen, is not too bad. (Click the image to see it larger.) This is a pretty reasonable compromise between the brights and darks.


Raw


Now, you don't have to use either DRO or HDR. As I said above, you can take steps to reduce the dynamic range, usually by lightening the shadows. For instance, I could have used flash here, or I could have turned the kitchen lights on. You can also shoot raw and fix problems on the computer. This is what a lot of very good photographers do, and it works. The raw data file has a lot more latitude than a jpeg. To compare what I can get from the raw file with what Sony's in-camera DRO and HDR offer, I reshot the scene, saved the raw file, and processed it myself in Lightroom.

I used an adjustment brush to bring the bright areas (the windows) down 1.5 stops, and a separate brush to bring the shadow areas up 1.5 stops. I wasn't doing this for a client so I was content to do this quick and dirty. Even so, the result was pretty good:

Raw file in Lightroom after adjustment brushes have darkened the highlights and lightened the shadows.
Remember, the original of this image was the file I showed at the start of this post.

What's best: DRO, or HDR, or Raw?


So I ended up with three pretty good or at least okay results, achieved in three very different ways.

It's a tough call and I'm not sure, but I think that — in this case, at least — I like the HDR 6EV result the best.

Ah, but HDR has some serious drawbacks.

I'm tempted to say that in-camera HDR is "easy" but that's not quite true. It would be if I could use HDR AUTO, but as I showed above, this produces a result not much better than DRO AUTO. To get the best result with in-camera HDR, I have to calculate (or guess) by what amount the dynamic range of the scene exceeds the capacity of the sensor, and set the HDR level accordingly. This isn't that hard but you can end up making a couple stabs at the shot before you get it right. May still take less time than working on the raw file in Lightroom. Or it might not.

Morever, because in-camera HDR takes multiple exposures and then processes them, achieving a single HDR result in the camera takes about five or six seconds. And you simply can't use it if anything in the scene is moving quickly. Finally, the A77's processor saves the HDR file as a jpeg, by necessity. The HDR file is a composite, a processed result. There is no raw original of the HDR result.

This makes shooting raw look like the safe way to go. Just remember that, if you just shoot raw, be prepared to do the work in post to fix exposure problems caused by the sensor's inability to match the scene's dynamic range.

If you really, really want the very best result obtainable, you can use computer-based HDR. This allows you to shoot several bracketed exposures, save them as raw files, then merge them in Photoshop or an HDR program. But that's a lot more work than I went to fixing my one raw file.

If you like things easy and prefer to shoot JPEG, well, I'd leave DRO on AUTO, all the time. It will help you occasionally and do no harm the rest of the time.

And if you really want to hedge your bets, shoot RAW + JPEG with DRO AUTO enabled. You may find that the raw file is badly exposed but the jpeg is usable and you won't have to fuss with the raw file on the computer.

Comments

  1. I am not a pro, William, and I only shoot rental homes (inside and out), but this post is darn interesting. Thank you for giving us 'other' options to consider.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wireless control of Olympus OM-D E-M1 with OI.Share app

The Olympus Image Share or "OI.Share" app for smartphones allows you to do some very neat things with the Olympus OM-D E-M1 camera, like control focus, shutter and other settings, download photos to your phone, and geo-tag your photos. The only problem with this partnership between camera and phone — at least for me as a micro-four-thirds and Olympus novice — was getting it to work.

The documentation provided in the app and in the user manual for the camera is typically bad. I wrote this blog article from the notes I started making as I was trying to sort this out for myself. I hope I save somebody else an hour and some worry.

Ingredients To get started you'll need to have an EM-1 and a smart phone with the OI.Share app installed. I'm using an iPhone 5 running iOS 7 and version 2.1.1 of the OI.Share app. I downloaded the app from the App Store.

Addendum 7 January 2015: This article was first published a little over a year ago, in December 2013. I just went through the…

Why I switched from Lightroom to Aperture

Read today an excellent article, "Why I use Aperture instead of Lightroom," by Mel Ashar; it's posted at the Aperture Expert blog edited by Joseph Linaschke. Ashar, a landscape and architectural photographer, provides a useful catalog of some of the reasons Aperture is a strong choice for photographers who use Macs. He focuses on the file-management advantages of Aperture that arise from the fact that Apple controls an entire file ecosystem, comprised not just of Aperture, but of iCloud and the file systems on both Macs and iOS devices (iPhone, iPad).

Now, notwithstanding the advantages Ashar enumerates, the consensus seems to be that, Aperture as a photo processing app lags way behind Lightroom. I disagree with the consensus. In fact, shortly after the public beta of Lightroom 5 became available, I started looking again at Aperture and this time I really gave it the old college try. To my surprise, I discovered that I liked it. I liked it a lot. So, instead of upgrading…

Why DxO Optics Pro 10 stays in my toolbox

You can read this post here, or read my reposted version over over at Medium.


I've used over a dozen apps in the last decade to convert my raw files and process my digital images. Today I rely on four main tools to process my images: Lightroom 5.7, the Nik suite of apps (now owned and published by Google), onOne Software's Perfect Photo Suite 9 — and DxO Optics Pro 10. I want to talk about Perfect Photo Suite some other time; it's my replacement for Photoshop and I really like it. But today, I want to say nice things about Optics Pro 10.

Might seem an odd thing to admit, but I don't really want to use Optics Pro. It can't hold a candle to Lightroom for browsing and managing images. And it doesn't support layers (like Perfect Photo Suite) or much in the way of selective editing (like Lightroom, Nik and Perfect Photo Suite do). I'm able to get what I want from most of my images using Lightroom, or Nik or Perfect Photo. So most of the time, I don't need Op…