Skip to main content

Correction: Why photos converted by RPP look darker

I had the pleasure of hearing tonight from Andrey Tverdokhleb, developer of RPP, the outstanding raw converter that I wrote about here yesterday. I want to correct something I said yesterday and pass on a tip Andrey gave to me.

Why RPP's output is darker

First, the correction. I commented yesterday that many of RPP's conversions end up looking noticeably darker than conversions of the same raw file done by Lightroom. I made a guess — a bad guess — about why this might be so. I needn't have guessed. Andrey draws my attention to an FAQ about RPP where this phenomenon is briefly explained. I know I had seen this page, but the info there hadn't sunk in yet when I was writing yesterday.

The gist seems to be as follows: RPP is telling me the truth, while Lightroom (like most other raw workflow programs) is conspiring with my camera in a sort of lie or misrepresentation. I hasten to say that the camera makers and the software companies are lying to us for our own good. The cameras are calibrated to underexpose deliberately, in order to avoid blowing highlights. And the raw converters like Lightroom, knowing how the cameras behave, silently compensate by increasing the exposure value (moving the histogram to the right) so that pictures look properly exposed. RPP does not make this silent adjustment. So if your pictures look underexposed after RPP converts them, it's because they really are underexposed.

The explanation in the RPP FAQ calls to mind a recent article by Michael Reichmann at Luminous Landscape titled "Optimizing Exposure" about how digital camera makers persist in metering exposure in a wrong-headed way. That article in turn harks back to Reichmann's now classic "Expose Right" essay from 2003, one of the most important technical articles ever written for digital photographers.

I am still sorting out RPP but I am starting to think that it may make a change to the way I shoot, well, at least to the way I expose my photos. Maybe I will say more about this later when I feel more confident.

Getting the most out of RPP

The tip that Andrey gave me in tonight's email is to be aware that certain things really need to be done right in RPP, before anything further is done in Lightroom. This tip could be considered a correction, also, because I said yesterday that you can just use RPP's defaults and needn't worry about the details. Sort of true. I mean, I did it and my first clumsy efforts with RPP were very satisfactory. But I see now that, for best results, I should be paying attention in RPP to more of those settings. Apparently white balance is the most important one to get right from the moment of conversion. I gather that I should be letting RPP handle as much else as possible, so that adjustments that a derived from the raw data get the benefit of RPP's more accurate calculations.

(Posted using BlogPress from my iPad2)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wireless control of Olympus OM-D E-M1 with OI.Share app

The Olympus Image Share or "OI.Share" app for smartphones allows you to do some very neat things with the Olympus OM-D E-M1 camera, like control focus, shutter and other settings, download photos to your phone, and geo-tag your photos. The only problem with this partnership between camera and phone — at least for me as a micro-four-thirds and Olympus novice — was getting it to work.

The documentation provided in the app and in the user manual for the camera is typically bad. I wrote this blog article from the notes I started making as I was trying to sort this out for myself. I hope I save somebody else an hour and some worry.

Ingredients To get started you'll need to have an EM-1 and a smart phone with the OI.Share app installed. I'm using an iPhone 5 running iOS 7 and version 2.1.1 of the OI.Share app. I downloaded the app from the App Store.

Addendum 7 January 2015: This article was first published a little over a year ago, in December 2013. I just went through the…

Why DxO Optics Pro 10 stays in my toolbox

You can read this post here, or read my reposted version over over at Medium.


I've used over a dozen apps in the last decade to convert my raw files and process my digital images. Today I rely on four main tools to process my images: Lightroom 5.7, the Nik suite of apps (now owned and published by Google), onOne Software's Perfect Photo Suite 9 — and DxO Optics Pro 10. I want to talk about Perfect Photo Suite some other time; it's my replacement for Photoshop and I really like it. But today, I want to say nice things about Optics Pro 10.

Might seem an odd thing to admit, but I don't really want to use Optics Pro. It can't hold a candle to Lightroom for browsing and managing images. And it doesn't support layers (like Perfect Photo Suite) or much in the way of selective editing (like Lightroom, Nik and Perfect Photo Suite do). I'm able to get what I want from most of my images using Lightroom, or Nik or Perfect Photo. So most of the time, I don't need Op…

Why I switched from Lightroom to Aperture

Read today an excellent article, "Why I use Aperture instead of Lightroom," by Mel Ashar; it's posted at the Aperture Expert blog edited by Joseph Linaschke. Ashar, a landscape and architectural photographer, provides a useful catalog of some of the reasons Aperture is a strong choice for photographers who use Macs. He focuses on the file-management advantages of Aperture that arise from the fact that Apple controls an entire file ecosystem, comprised not just of Aperture, but of iCloud and the file systems on both Macs and iOS devices (iPhone, iPad).

Now, notwithstanding the advantages Ashar enumerates, the consensus seems to be that, Aperture as a photo processing app lags way behind Lightroom. I disagree with the consensus. In fact, shortly after the public beta of Lightroom 5 became available, I started looking again at Aperture and this time I really gave it the old college try. To my surprise, I discovered that I liked it. I liked it a lot. So, instead of upgrading…