Skip to main content

What's up with Facebook? It's getting worse

In response to the threat posed by Google+, Facebook seems to have decided to get WORSE rather than better. Seems like a risky strategy to me.

I uploaded some photos today to my personal Facebook page, my "wall". (That's a term I've never understood.) The first problem is that the photos looked awful in Facebook. I uploaded them directly from within Lightroom 3.5. Perhaps it's necessary to adjust the photos to some particular resolution before uploading — but I don't have to do that with any of the other photo sharing sites I use or have used (Zenfolio, Flickr, Picasa Web Albums, etc.). I have read that Facebook is the largest photo sharing site in the world. Amazing then that it's so awful in this regard.

So I deleted the album on Facebook, and uploaded the photos instead to Picasa Web Albums. Then I went back to Facebook to create a post letting my friends know where I'd moved the photos. There used to be a button labeled something like "Add a link" that you could use to add a link to an external page. It's gone. The only way I can see to add a link is to paste the link right into the text field where I'm writing my little message. But I don't want the link to stay in the text area, so after pasting it, once Facebook recognizes the link and adds it below my text, I have to select the link that I pasted and delete it from the text area. Bizarre.

And finally, I couldn't figure out how to DELETE a post while I was editing it. I could have just closed the window without saving the post, but then I have to open a new window or tab in my browser and go to Facebook again. So instead I saved the post, thinking I would quickly delete it. But after the post appeared, I realized I couldn't see how to delete it. There used to be an "x" button that would appear whenever my pointer hovered over a post of mine, but no longer. Eventually I found the "remove this post" command — in the pop-down used to select that group to share stuff with.

I'm starting to dislike Facebook. Google+ is easier to use in every way and Picasa Web Albums is vastly superior to Facebook as a photo-sharing service.

Here's an example of the problem I see with Facebook's display of photos. This isn't a technically good photo to start with, but that just means it's about like 99% of the other photos posted on Facebook. Here is a screen capture of the photo as viewed on my iMac, in Google Chrome, as displayed on Picasa Web Albums:



And here is the same  photo as viewed on Facebook:



The difference is pretty dramatic. You can click on the photos to view them larger (original size).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wireless control of Olympus OM-D E-M1 with OI.Share app

The Olympus Image Share or "OI.Share" app for smartphones allows you to do some very neat things with the Olympus OM-D E-M1 camera, like control focus, shutter and other settings, download photos to your phone, and geo-tag your photos. The only problem with this partnership between camera and phone — at least for me as a micro-four-thirds and Olympus novice — was getting it to work.

The documentation provided in the app and in the user manual for the camera is typically bad. I wrote this blog article from the notes I started making as I was trying to sort this out for myself. I hope I save somebody else an hour and some worry.

Ingredients To get started you'll need to have an EM-1 and a smart phone with the OI.Share app installed. I'm using an iPhone 5 running iOS 7 and version 2.1.1 of the OI.Share app. I downloaded the app from the App Store.

Addendum 7 January 2015: This article was first published a little over a year ago, in December 2013. I just went through the…

Why DxO Optics Pro 10 stays in my toolbox

You can read this post here, or read my reposted version over over at Medium.


I've used over a dozen apps in the last decade to convert my raw files and process my digital images. Today I rely on four main tools to process my images: Lightroom 5.7, the Nik suite of apps (now owned and published by Google), onOne Software's Perfect Photo Suite 9 — and DxO Optics Pro 10. I want to talk about Perfect Photo Suite some other time; it's my replacement for Photoshop and I really like it. But today, I want to say nice things about Optics Pro 10.

Might seem an odd thing to admit, but I don't really want to use Optics Pro. It can't hold a candle to Lightroom for browsing and managing images. And it doesn't support layers (like Perfect Photo Suite) or much in the way of selective editing (like Lightroom, Nik and Perfect Photo Suite do). I'm able to get what I want from most of my images using Lightroom, or Nik or Perfect Photo. So most of the time, I don't need Op…

Why I switched from Lightroom to Aperture

Read today an excellent article, "Why I use Aperture instead of Lightroom," by Mel Ashar; it's posted at the Aperture Expert blog edited by Joseph Linaschke. Ashar, a landscape and architectural photographer, provides a useful catalog of some of the reasons Aperture is a strong choice for photographers who use Macs. He focuses on the file-management advantages of Aperture that arise from the fact that Apple controls an entire file ecosystem, comprised not just of Aperture, but of iCloud and the file systems on both Macs and iOS devices (iPhone, iPad).

Now, notwithstanding the advantages Ashar enumerates, the consensus seems to be that, Aperture as a photo processing app lags way behind Lightroom. I disagree with the consensus. In fact, shortly after the public beta of Lightroom 5 became available, I started looking again at Aperture and this time I really gave it the old college try. To my surprise, I discovered that I liked it. I liked it a lot. So, instead of upgrading…