Skip to main content

War on Photography

A few years ago, I spent the morning on the campus of UT Southwestern Medical School here in Dallas, photographing snowy egrets in the rookery there. I drove into a public parking garage (well, it is "public" in the sense that you don't have to pay to drive in and no one challenges you when you do), and went up to the top floor, which overlooks the rookery. Within minutes, a campus police car rolled on to the top floor, the officer got out and challenged me. I had business cards with me, which seemed to mollify him, and he was actually fairly pleasant about it. My having a big camera with a big lens was proof enough that I'm photographer, but that wasn't the issue: I think the business card somehow proved that I'm not a terrorist. Anyway, he explained that the campus is very concerned about security and he advised me not to turn ninety degrees to my left and take photos of the hospital, implying that if I did, he'd be back and perhaps not in such a good mood. I stuck to photographing the birds.

Since then, I've read more and more about photographers being challenged while photographing in public places. I find these reports depressing. I'm actually a solid law-and-order guy and I certainly favor doing things that actually work to thwart terrorism. I don't think my right to (say) take photos of a nuclear power plant overrides the government's responsibility to protect the plant and local citizens. And my default position is always to support the police. But it's also clear to me that the police are not well informed on this subject. They are, after all, not generally constitutional scholars and seem to be pretty busy with other matters. And since everybody remains a bit touchy about the possibility of another 9/11 attack, well, the police are over-zealous.

Anyway, here's an excellent legal article by Morgan Lee Manning discussing these matters very thoroughly: "Less than Picture Perfect: The Legal Relationship between Photographers' Rights and Law Enforcement." I recommend it to photographers and lawyers—and especially to policemen. It's a pretty typical law review article, long and pretty dry in parts. But law reviews are built like sandwiches, except that the meat is on the outside. You can read the first five pages and the last five pages or so and pick up the gist pretty clearly. If you have the time and inclination to dig into the middle of the article, there's a lot of interesting stuff there, too.

We're hoping to make a trip to Washington DC in the next year or two. I really really don't want to get blown up by terrorists. But I would also like the police to feel confident that I, as a photographer, don't pose a threat to national security when I point my 200mm lens towards the Capitol Building. Could be that I'm just a guy with a camera who loves his country.

Hat tip: Glenn Reynolds.


Popular posts from this blog

Wireless control of Olympus OM-D E-M1 with OI.Share app

The Olympus Image Share or "OI.Share" app for smartphones allows you to do some very neat things with the Olympus OM-D E-M1 camera, like control focus, shutter and other settings, download photos to your phone, and geo-tag your photos. The only problem with this partnership between camera and phone — at least for me as a micro-four-thirds and Olympus novice — was getting it to work.

The documentation provided in the app and in the user manual for the camera is typically bad. I wrote this blog article from the notes I started making as I was trying to sort this out for myself. I hope I save somebody else an hour and some worry.

Ingredients To get started you'll need to have an EM-1 and a smart phone with the OI.Share app installed. I'm using an iPhone 5 running iOS 7 and version 2.1.1 of the OI.Share app. I downloaded the app from the App Store.

Addendum 7 January 2015: This article was first published a little over a year ago, in December 2013. I just went through the…

Why DxO Optics Pro 10 stays in my toolbox

You can read this post here, or read my reposted version over over at Medium.

I've used over a dozen apps in the last decade to convert my raw files and process my digital images. Today I rely on four main tools to process my images: Lightroom 5.7, the Nik suite of apps (now owned and published by Google), onOne Software's Perfect Photo Suite 9 — and DxO Optics Pro 10. I want to talk about Perfect Photo Suite some other time; it's my replacement for Photoshop and I really like it. But today, I want to say nice things about Optics Pro 10.

Might seem an odd thing to admit, but I don't really want to use Optics Pro. It can't hold a candle to Lightroom for browsing and managing images. And it doesn't support layers (like Perfect Photo Suite) or much in the way of selective editing (like Lightroom, Nik and Perfect Photo Suite do). I'm able to get what I want from most of my images using Lightroom, or Nik or Perfect Photo. So most of the time, I don't need Op…

Why I switched from Lightroom to Aperture

Read today an excellent article, "Why I use Aperture instead of Lightroom," by Mel Ashar; it's posted at the Aperture Expert blog edited by Joseph Linaschke. Ashar, a landscape and architectural photographer, provides a useful catalog of some of the reasons Aperture is a strong choice for photographers who use Macs. He focuses on the file-management advantages of Aperture that arise from the fact that Apple controls an entire file ecosystem, comprised not just of Aperture, but of iCloud and the file systems on both Macs and iOS devices (iPhone, iPad).

Now, notwithstanding the advantages Ashar enumerates, the consensus seems to be that, Aperture as a photo processing app lags way behind Lightroom. I disagree with the consensus. In fact, shortly after the public beta of Lightroom 5 became available, I started looking again at Aperture and this time I really gave it the old college try. To my surprise, I discovered that I liked it. I liked it a lot. So, instead of upgrading…