Skip to main content

The Royal Wedding

We recorded the royal wedding on a couple different channels and I did end up watching some of it yesterday, with my finger on the fast forward button most of the time. Just a few thoughts.

First, although the Brits do a big ceremony very well, I had a lot of esthetic complaints about the program. They have this venue, these musicians, and a universe of musical choices—and they came up with that program? Unbelievable. If you're going to sing "Ubi caritas et amor," for heaven's sake, sing the great setting by DuruflĂ©! The fanfares sounded like they were taken from some old Hollywood movie.

I also thought the sermon was a missed opportunity. I always listen to the sermons at the weddings I shoot. I've heard some great sermons about marriage—some that really deserved to be heard by the whole world. This wasn't one of them.

Prince William and Lady Catherine on their wedding day
Picture Credit: Photograph by Hugo Burnand

On a more positive note, for starters, they are certainly going to have a great wedding album.

I like the young couple. She was a very beautiful bride and he a most handsome groom. I don't know much about Catherine personally but from the little I know about William, I rather like him. Good strong name, for starters. I admire the work that he does piloting a rescue helicopter—dangerous, real work. Come to think of it, I like her name too. Our youngest daughter is named Catherine, and our oldest daughter's middle name is Elizabeth.

But in the end, they're just another couple getting married. Obviously they have some terrific advantages. I don't think they're going to worry much about paying their bills. But look at the marriage of Diana and Charles and you should see that there is no couple in the world whose marriage lacks for challenges.

"Still, the institution endures, even when a particular marriage falls apart. Our failure to attain it doesn’t change the ideal." That's a comment by Jennifer Marshall at the National Review online, and I agree. A royal wedding is, in the end, just another wedding. I pray that God blesses them and guards their love. I get the impression that they really do love one another and that's a good start. Now I hope the rest of the world can leave them alone at least from time to time.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wireless control of Olympus OM-D E-M1 with OI.Share app

The Olympus Image Share or "OI.Share" app for smartphones allows you to do some very neat things with the Olympus OM-D E-M1 camera, like control focus, shutter and other settings, download photos to your phone, and geo-tag your photos. The only problem with this partnership between camera and phone — at least for me as a micro-four-thirds and Olympus novice — was getting it to work.

The documentation provided in the app and in the user manual for the camera is typically bad. I wrote this blog article from the notes I started making as I was trying to sort this out for myself. I hope I save somebody else an hour and some worry.

Ingredients To get started you'll need to have an EM-1 and a smart phone with the OI.Share app installed. I'm using an iPhone 5 running iOS 7 and version 2.1.1 of the OI.Share app. I downloaded the app from the App Store.

Addendum 7 January 2015: This article was first published a little over a year ago, in December 2013. I just went through the…

Why I switched from Lightroom to Aperture

Read today an excellent article, "Why I use Aperture instead of Lightroom," by Mel Ashar; it's posted at the Aperture Expert blog edited by Joseph Linaschke. Ashar, a landscape and architectural photographer, provides a useful catalog of some of the reasons Aperture is a strong choice for photographers who use Macs. He focuses on the file-management advantages of Aperture that arise from the fact that Apple controls an entire file ecosystem, comprised not just of Aperture, but of iCloud and the file systems on both Macs and iOS devices (iPhone, iPad).

Now, notwithstanding the advantages Ashar enumerates, the consensus seems to be that, Aperture as a photo processing app lags way behind Lightroom. I disagree with the consensus. In fact, shortly after the public beta of Lightroom 5 became available, I started looking again at Aperture and this time I really gave it the old college try. To my surprise, I discovered that I liked it. I liked it a lot. So, instead of upgrading…

Why DxO Optics Pro 10 stays in my toolbox

You can read this post here, or read my reposted version over over at Medium.


I've used over a dozen apps in the last decade to convert my raw files and process my digital images. Today I rely on four main tools to process my images: Lightroom 5.7, the Nik suite of apps (now owned and published by Google), onOne Software's Perfect Photo Suite 9 — and DxO Optics Pro 10. I want to talk about Perfect Photo Suite some other time; it's my replacement for Photoshop and I really like it. But today, I want to say nice things about Optics Pro 10.

Might seem an odd thing to admit, but I don't really want to use Optics Pro. It can't hold a candle to Lightroom for browsing and managing images. And it doesn't support layers (like Perfect Photo Suite) or much in the way of selective editing (like Lightroom, Nik and Perfect Photo Suite do). I'm able to get what I want from most of my images using Lightroom, or Nik or Perfect Photo. So most of the time, I don't need Op…