Skip to main content

Pseudo-tethered shooting with an Eye-Fi card, an iPad and ShutterSnitch





No boundaries

Originally uploaded by William Porter


This photo is one I took as a test of a wireless "tethered" shooting set-up I have going here. The ingredients are: my DSLR (in this case a Sony A550) with an Eye-Fi wireless SD card inside; and an iPad running the PhotoSnitch app.

http://2ndnature.thebrew.dk/shuttersnitch/

Once it's launched on the iPad, PhotoSnitch communicates with the Eye-Fi card and vice versa, so that I take a photo, and a few seconds later, the photo appears on the iPad's screen (inside PhotoSnitch) where I can review it on the iPad's nice and relatively large screen rather than using the high-res but tiny screen on the camera.

I had a wee bit of trouble setting PhotoSnitch up initially. If you have previously configured your Eye-Fi card to send photos to your computer, you have to mount the card on the computer first, open the Eye-Fi Center software and basically follow the instructions to break that link. Only then do you put the card into the camera, launch PhotoSnitch on the iPad, and finish up the connection from there. It was this part that I had a little trouble with, but somehow—to be honest, I'm not sure how—it worked itself out and now it works terrifically.

For studio portraits, this can be really nice. It lets the client-subject see the photo right away. Whether it's so useful for the photographer, I'm not sure. I do not generally "chimp" my photos, at least not excessively. I can usually wait to get the photos on to the computer for review.

NOTE that ShutterSnitch and Eye-Fi require a Wi-Fi network. The camera isn't talking directly to the iPad; they are both talking over the network. Too bad the Eye-Fi card doesn't support Bluetooth. Anyway, I understand that you can buy a small portable router that would let you create a not very "Wi" Wi-fi network anywhere. Sweet.

A final point. This isn't "tethered" shooting, at least not in the traditional sense. It's called "tethered" shooting because in the past, you connected the camera to the computer via a cable (the "tether"). I suspect cable would be faster, but it comes with the risk that you'll trip over the cord and pull your computer on to the floor.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wireless control of Olympus OM-D E-M1 with OI.Share app

The Olympus Image Share or "OI.Share" app for smartphones allows you to do some very neat things with the Olympus OM-D E-M1 camera, like control focus, shutter and other settings, download photos to your phone, and geo-tag your photos. The only problem with this partnership between camera and phone — at least for me as a micro-four-thirds and Olympus novice — was getting it to work.

The documentation provided in the app and in the user manual for the camera is typically bad. I wrote this blog article from the notes I started making as I was trying to sort this out for myself. I hope I save somebody else an hour and some worry.

Ingredients To get started you'll need to have an EM-1 and a smart phone with the OI.Share app installed. I'm using an iPhone 5 running iOS 7 and version 2.1.1 of the OI.Share app. I downloaded the app from the App Store.

Addendum 7 January 2015: This article was first published a little over a year ago, in December 2013. I just went through the…

Why DxO Optics Pro 10 stays in my toolbox

You can read this post here, or read my reposted version over over at Medium.


I've used over a dozen apps in the last decade to convert my raw files and process my digital images. Today I rely on four main tools to process my images: Lightroom 5.7, the Nik suite of apps (now owned and published by Google), onOne Software's Perfect Photo Suite 9 — and DxO Optics Pro 10. I want to talk about Perfect Photo Suite some other time; it's my replacement for Photoshop and I really like it. But today, I want to say nice things about Optics Pro 10.

Might seem an odd thing to admit, but I don't really want to use Optics Pro. It can't hold a candle to Lightroom for browsing and managing images. And it doesn't support layers (like Perfect Photo Suite) or much in the way of selective editing (like Lightroom, Nik and Perfect Photo Suite do). I'm able to get what I want from most of my images using Lightroom, or Nik or Perfect Photo. So most of the time, I don't need Op…

Why I switched from Lightroom to Aperture

Read today an excellent article, "Why I use Aperture instead of Lightroom," by Mel Ashar; it's posted at the Aperture Expert blog edited by Joseph Linaschke. Ashar, a landscape and architectural photographer, provides a useful catalog of some of the reasons Aperture is a strong choice for photographers who use Macs. He focuses on the file-management advantages of Aperture that arise from the fact that Apple controls an entire file ecosystem, comprised not just of Aperture, but of iCloud and the file systems on both Macs and iOS devices (iPhone, iPad).

Now, notwithstanding the advantages Ashar enumerates, the consensus seems to be that, Aperture as a photo processing app lags way behind Lightroom. I disagree with the consensus. In fact, shortly after the public beta of Lightroom 5 became available, I started looking again at Aperture and this time I really gave it the old college try. To my surprise, I discovered that I liked it. I liked it a lot. So, instead of upgrading…